Instagram is used by over a billion individuals who spend an estimated 30 minutes per day on the image-heavy network (eMarketer, 2020). However, academics know relatively little about how Instagram affects its users’ mental health.
Internal Facebook studies, which were disclosed in September by The Wall Street Journal, show how the...
Instagram is used by over a billion individuals who spend an estimated 30 minutes per day on the image-heavy network (eMarketer, 2020). However, academics know relatively little about how Instagram affects its users’ mental health.
Internal Facebook studies, which were disclosed in September by The Wall Street Journal, show how the app can hurt kids, including increased body image worries for one in every three teenage girls, but the data is correlational and self-reported. The same can be said for much of the field’s research, which is still in its early phases but is beginning to pick up speed, such as experimental investigations, longitudinal analysis, and fMRI initiatives.
What is the psychology behind Instagram?
Instagram has been connected to depression, body image difficulties, self-esteem issues, social anxiety, and other disorders in studies. The program takes advantage of users’ inherent desire for social connection and encourages them to keep scrolling.
Instagram’s addictive nature is part of what makes it troublesome. According to psychologist Adam Alter, Ph.D., a professor of marketing at New York University’s Stern School of Business, unlike a magazine, television show, or video game, the platform rarely provides ‘stopping cues’ or subtle nudges that persuade users to go on to another activity. Instead, it keeps delivering content, causing users to return to the top of their feeds and repeat the process.
The creation of the self online can be seen as a distortion of reality unable to keep up for sustained periods. Interpretations online are rarely accurate social psychology books, however, are in person.
Instagram great tool for building a brand, engaging directly with customers, flawed in a sense of what is real and what is not, filter culture, having to present one’s best self forward. Changes made such as making people aware filters were used is a good start and being able to make changes to what adverts you see, can opt-out of diet adverts, etc. Reference.
Theories
Presenting the self-online opposing theories
When presenting yourself online, you may or may not be consciously aware of the goal of that behavior. Whatever the goal of your online activity, you will select and present aspects of yourself that can be tailored to meet that goal. Katz, Blumler, and Gurevitch’s (1973) Use and Gratifications Theory is in line with many other theories that posit all human behavior to be goal-driven. For example, Deci and Ryan (2000) suggest human behavior be driven by an underlying need for human belonging. The inclusion of the Uses and Gratifications hypothesis argues that any sort of Internet conduct is likely goal-driven, in the sense that it attempts to meet basic human needs and desires, whether consciously or unconsciously. As a result, online behaviour necessitates a flexible self that can be changed to meet any aim. These internal and external forces, however, are not the only ones that influence our actions. There are a plethora of other aspects of human behaviour that serve to limit and govern our online personas.
Human interaction, according to Davis and Kraus (1989), stems from a need to meet social demands. Which self you show online will be determined not only by the aim you are attempting to attain but also by which additional philosophy you choose to follow. According to McKenna, Green, and Gleason (2002), a person is more likely to mould themselves and engage in online connections to compensate for inhibitions in offline social encounters. While this concept emphasises the employment of a unique online self, it can also be extended to persons who display an extended offline life online. According to Valkenburg, Schouten, and Peter’s (2005) concept of social enhancement, one’s online self is an extension of one’s offline self, and one’s online self is crafted and created in the same way whether the person interacts online or offline. Regardless of whether of these two options (among a plethora of others) is pursued (or not).
299
