Reasons For The Abolishment Of The Death Penalty
Martin Luther King, Jr. (Ebony, 1957) when being asked the question of “Do you think God approves the death penalty for crimes like rape and murder?”, answered that: “Capital punishment is against the best judgment of modern criminology and, above all, against the highest expression of love in the nature of God”. For many centuries, capital punishment has been one of the most controversial affairs for mankind, due to the complexity of humanity, justice, and its two-sided consequences. Executions are believed to have existed around 1760 BC, with the Code of Hammurabi. However, with the change of time and humans life quality, capital punishment has shown several drawbacks that need to be dealt with. This essay covers reasons for the abolishment of the death penalty, which are evidence of racism and discrimination, degradingly negative effects on the victims’ family and issues related to human rights.
To begin with, although we are living in the age of globalization, racial discrimination in capital punishment is still apparent with various evidences. According to Mattie Elliott (Stop capital punishment, 2018), a study in North Carolina found that if the victim was white, the imposition of the death sentence to the defendants was 3.5 times more likely than in a similar circumstance but the victim was black. In addition, as claimed in Capital punishment in context, in 1990, an examination by the United States General found that in 82% of the cases they studied, those who murdered whites were more likely to be sentenced to death than those who murdered blacks. In an article by All That’s Interesting (updated 2019), the story of George Stinney Jr.- the youngest person to be executed in an electric chair when he was only fourteen, is one of the example of how discrimination used to exist in court. In the case of Geogre Stinney Jr., although he allegedly confessed the crime, there was no written record of the teen admitting to the murders. Eventually, after a 10-minute deliberation, the all-white jury accused him of first-degree murder and on the same day, they sentenced him to death by electric chair after a two-hour trial without any concrete evidence.
Humans oppose murdering, but why would we still agree with an execution, which aims at putting one’s life to an end? The death penalty might be regarded as a reimbursement for the victim and the victim’s family, but eventually what is left would still be a pain for both sides. According to Dr. Robert T. Muller (Psychology Today blog, Talking About Trauma, 2016), psychological studies have proved that the death penalty produces negative effects on families and friends of murder victims (referred to as “co-victims”). Also in his article, one University of Minnesota study found that just 2.5% of co-victims reported achieving closure as a result of capital punishment, while 20.1% said the execution did not help them heal. As John P. Kotter said in his book: “transformation is a process, not an event” (Leading change, 1996), every pain in life takes time to recover, not after one day or two, but it is a long process for anyone who suffers. From my viewpoint, I do not stand in favor of the offenders, since they have to pay for their wrongdoings, but I do not believe that taking one more life away is the proper solution for healing.
The last reason why I believe we should abolish capital punishment is that everyone has a right to live, a chance to re-do and to compensate for what they have done. Although there are murderers who are psychopaths and are willing to kill random people, executing does not mean that our community will be a safer place to live since some individuals might learn from their behaviors and become a worse threat. For the case of psychopaths, the entire killing is meant to highlight the wrong that has been done to them while at the same time punishing those responsible (Deborah Schurman-Kauflin, Psychology Today, 2012). Although this case is still in controversy, about whether psychopaths can change their behaviors or not and should they be executed for mass murdering, in a study by Dr. Rhonda Freeman (Neuroinstincts, 2013), scientists are still learning about this disorder, especially regarding treatment. According to an article by David Von Drehle (Time, 2014), a new statistical analysis stated that the rate of wrongful death sentences in the U.S. is probably much higher than experts have estimated, approximately 120 of the roughly 3,000 inmates on death row might not be guilty. In Newsweek (2014) by Pema Levy, a new study, released in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, one in 25 sentenced to death in the U.S is innocent, which is about 4.1 percent. That 4.1 percent did not have the chance to start over a new life or to indemnify for the victims. As humans, we are all equal and have the same right to live, even the guilty ones.
Overall, the issue of whether to abolish capital punishment or not is always controversial and requires every country to sternly reckon its impact on citizens’ life. There are different law systems in every country, while some countries are doing a great job with handling criminals, some are not. Take Norway’s prison system for example, according to Life in Norway Editorial Team (Living in Norway, 2018), the percentage of people that are sent to prison for the second sentence in Norway hovers at or below 20%, almost three times lower than in the United States where the rate is from 60 to 75%. This is because Norway focuses on relaxation and education for the prisoners, which shows that the government truly pays attention to the criminals and the victims’ rehabilitation. Also in their article, Norwegian jails attempt to mimic the outside world as much as possible, to prepare the inmates for freedom and encourage them for education. Capital punishment still has affairs of discrimination, its negative impact on the rehabilitation process and violation of human rights, therefore it should not be encouraged and other solutions such as life imprisonment and improving the education for citizens and inmates should be considered.
Maintaining a moral and civilized society often comes with many struggles, one of which being the decision on how to deal with the punishment of criminals. All throughout history the different attempts at regulation of crime can be seen, because all that any society wants is to just protect its people and ensure justice. One pivotal example of this is capital punishment, better known as the death penalty. Capital punishment is when a person is executed for crimes they have...
General Purpose: To persuade Specific Purpose: To shed a positive light on the death penalty sentence in place for murderers. I. Introduction Attention Getter: Let us close our eyes and imagine going home to your loved ones only to get there and notice that they have been robbed and killed. How would you feel? Common Ground + Credibility: According to Merriam Webster’s online dictionary, the death penalty also known as capital punishment is death as a punishment given by a...
Death sentence has been elucidated as lawful imposition of death as penalty for a criminal offence. It’s been described as an extreme and irreversible form of punishment since it takes away life and any mistake while awarding the same cannot be reversed. It’s usually awarded in cases where the nature of offence is such that it cannot be abated without a death penalty. The offences for which death penalty is awarded are described as ‘heinous’; the term has not been...
Is the death penalty right? The United States currently has a death penalty in more than 30 states. Some states do not carry out actual executions, but other states still carry out actual executions. What is the opinion of those who support and oppose the death penalty? First, my opinion is in favor of the death penalty. The state I live in now is the state where the death penalty was abolished. The death penalty must, under whatever circumstances, be...
Eighth Amendment: When Is It Too Much? The Eighth Amendment of the American Constitution was passed in 1791, prohibiting disproportionate amounts of bail and fines, and also abolishing cruel and unusual punishment as used of deterring crime. It took inspiration from the English Bill of Rights, which is why the Eighth Amendment is almost word for word with it. Though the Eighth Amendment is necessary for criminals to keep their rights, the amendment doesn’t specify what is excessive bail or...
The debate over whether the death penalty should be abolished or not is one of the top long-lasting and perfervid debated topics in the world. Some support the ‘ eye for an eye ‘ or ‘ life for life ‘ philosophy, while others believe that sanctioned death is wrong. Humans are meant to live by following some rules and regulations. Breaking those rules is subject to punishment. The seriousness of the crime determines the degree of punishment. Since time immemorial,...
The death penalty is the punishment handed to people found guilty of capital criminal offenses. Capital punishment is also called the death penalty, and it is carried out through the execution of the offender (Balleisen, 2018). Through death penalty involves killing the offender; it is essential to extrajudicial killing since the latter is done without following the due process stipulated by the law. Though the term capital punishment can be used interchangeably with the term death penalty, it does not...
According to the National Alliance on Mental Illness, mental illnesses are described as “medical conditions that disrupt a person’s thinking, feeling, mood, ability to relate to others and daily functioning”. This means that individuals suffering from mental illness are susceptible to be out of control or lose control of their actions because of their mental disabilities. There is currently no law that prohibits handing down the death penalty to an individual who is mentally ill but according to the US...
The death penalty, also known as Capital Punishment is the most egregious and very controversial punishment, that’s why I chose to talk about it in my report. Capital punishment is only sentenced to crimes of the worst sort, such as murders, terrorists, and maybe rapists. Capital punishment has engendered ubiquitous arguments debating whether it’s advantageous or erroneous whilst exploring both its morality and criminal behavior. The death penalty’s primary aim is to reduce the number of heinous crimes. Some argue...
01 / 09
Fair Use Policy
EduBirdie considers academic integrity to be the essential part of the learning process and does not support any violation of the academic standards. Should you have any questions regarding our Fair Use Policy or become aware of any violations, please do not hesitate to contact us via firstname.lastname@example.org.
We are here 24/7 to write your paper in as fast as 3 hours.