Moral principles function as a prerequisite for human life. Wargrave the retired judge and has a profession that signifies his character’s unique way of the perception of the ethical values, meant to reveal the virtue of judicial systems in fighting the will for crime in human beings. For Wargrave, his victims’ crimes are vicious doings they must be punished for. Yet he wants to punish those who consign bad deeds by his own hands (Christie303). For he has a strong desire to tell people what is right, deeply influenced by his position as a judge. One more motivation for Wargrave is his wish to recover the mistaken system.
The role that morality operates in And Then There Were None is different; for it is no more about God’s regulations, it is about crimes. While the law always replicates the ethical society; in a sense, it is the morality of the people that do not reflect the beliefs rather even those who; “count and who speak out in the community” as well (Friedman qtd. in Pruitt4). That person who speak out loud without saying a word; his actions and assumptions, build his presence in society. Like the case of Wargrave, makes his existence by the observation and the behaviors he has, so he can assure his presence in his community. This can also give hints to that Wargrave believes in actions, yet he wants to observe. He confronts that he was observing the guests’ activities while he was on the terrace; Christie portrayed him as a person who observes before doing the act (Christie161). Giving proves to his victims that he is observing their movements.
Moreover, people change as morals and customs naturally do, with rising and diminishing intensities and inclinations (Freedman qtd in Pruitt4). Wargrave’s world is different from that of the other guests (his victims). This forged moralist receives crimes as an illegal deed; thus he accepted the idea that to be himself the punisher. He believes in moralistic values as judicial rules; the lucid simple example for his corrupted Morals is his fake death by the brand of Cain; which stands for the first murderer of Able by his brother Cain in the Book of genesis.
In addition, the guilt of his sufferers is the result of his disturbed contradicted morals. He uses the mark of Cain (that scar in his forehead) as a metaphor to bring an understanding of his relation to Claim at the end of the document he sent to the police, to claim that: “The third, [the third clue], [is symbolical. The manner of my death marking me on the forehead. The brand of Cain”], which serves as an overlap between the biblical story of Cain, the son of Adam and Eve and that of judge Wargrave (Christie316). This highlights Wargrave’s correlation with Cain’s perspectives on God’s rules back then. Christopher Chanock explained in Kenyou. Edu. Com website that “Am, I brother’s keeper” is an answer to Cain’s standpoint that he is not responsible for the termination of his brother Able, so in the eye of Cain his actions alone absolutely do not worth any panel (Chanock). The same how, Wargrave thinks, that he is not responsible for God’s failure in accomplishing moral justice on the earth; so it is not his fault that he kills and reprimand criminals.
Wargrave sees himself able to judge in contrast to others. He is certainly judging those unblemished guests for escaping justice. Christie used Wargrave’s judgment as a notion to pore-over that judgment is God’s quality, not humans; for they are not able to critic each other. He plays also a judgmental role trying to preach the victims and their actions, judging and playing God’s role like the case of many people in real life; Vera Claythorne (the secretary) starts thinking in her-self “he plays God almighty for a good many months every year” (Christie181). Wargrave intends to take God’s work to do what God could not do as he believes; so he selects his victims to panel them himself instead of God. It is also credible in the description of his voice as having a judging moralistic tone as described by Ethel Rogers, Thomas Rogers’ wife; “the voice that sounds like Judgment” (Christie62). Describing his judicial tone and how much of a saint he is judging others’ actions instead of his. In fact, the judgmental deposits itself on Wargrave, thinking that judging is the power he has to underestimate others. Indeed, actions and tone of authority say a lot about the selfish judgmental Wargrave.