A Rose For Emily Essays | By William Faulkner

The ending to “A Rose for Emily” hits like a punchline to a bad joke. William Faulkner is known for pulling at the moral implications of history and people’s interpretations. He believed that politics and religion reclude to provide order and peace and instead complicate and create enemies, in addition to society’s judgment, and harsh statements. In many of Faulkner’s stories, the characters come upon challenges that prevented them from realizing their potential or their place in the world. His short story “A Rose for Emily” aligns perfectly with his views. The story’s theme and secretive narrator create the auto secrecy and uniqueness to the story.

The encasing theme of the story allows the reader to level and better understand the author’s position from within. Faulkner’s examination of the power of death through Emily is his way of showing his opinion of corruption of the human mind. As death hovers over “A Rose for Emily,” the narrator’s exclamation of her death at the start of the story through the portrayal of Emily’s haunted life. The storyteller compares her to a suffocated lady, a bloated and pale figure cleared out as well long within the water. Within the same portrayal, he alludes to her little, save skeleton—she is essentially dead on her feet. Her strange relationship to the dead bodies of the men she has loved is uncovered to begin with when her father passes on. Slaughtering Homer was her way to ensure that she was able to keep him close her. Emily and Homer’s twisted marriage uncovers Emily’s aggravating endeavor to combine life and passing. Her fixation and the community’s assumptions were proven after her death along with revealing the biggest secret of all – her necrophilia. Concluding that Emily’s behavior portrays Faulkner’s twisted thoughts on the subject of death.

Narration style varies from author to author, it is what gives the story its individuality. “A Rose for Emily” is Faulkner’s experiment of a new approach to storytelling. One of the strategies that Faulkner utilized to create “A Rose for Emily’ was his application of an anonymous storyteller whose relationship to Emily and whose part in the life of the town is to some degree equivocal. Still, the reader cannot stop to be struck by the way in which the storyteller tells the story of the unusual Miss Emily, always utilizing the word “we’ to portray the sentiments of the townspeople and their doubts of her. The storyteller talks some of the time for the men of Jefferson, in some cases for the ladies, and regularly for both. It too ranges three eras mentioned in the story, counting the era of Miss Emily’s father, Miss Emily’s era, and the ‘more up to date era,’ made up of the children of Miss Emily’s counterparts. The storyteller is lovely difficult on the primary two eras, and it’s simple to see how their treatment of Miss Emily may have driven to her destruction. This loans the story to a degree a revealing feeling.

William Faulkner is known as one of the best authors of all time. His exclusive approach to expressing his own beliefs in a way that feels naturalistic and self-evaluating. “A Rose for Emily” was his recollection with a spin of his modernized opinions about a necrophilic woman who killed her husband to be closer to him. His theme of how powerful death is on one person is the underlying lesson he was trying to portray. Faulkner’s take on narration is one that revolutionized the role of the narrator allowing him to take so many positions yet still staying unknown. These styles give “A Rose For Emily” the nostalgia and individualism that it’s known for today.