Argumentative Essay: Gun Control Is Oppression

Essay type:
This essay sample was donated by a student to help the academic community. Papers provided by EduBirdie writers usually outdo students' samples.

Cite this essay cite-image

These gatherings frequently can't help contradicting the translation of firearm-related laws and techniques, and the effect of weapon control on wrongdoing and open security. It is evaluated that US regular citizens possess 393 million guns and that 35% to 42% of families in the nation have in any event one weapon. The United States has the most elevated evaluated number of weapons per capita, with 120.5 weapons per 100 individuals.

The accessibility of guns in the United States has been described by worry about the option to carry weapons, as found in the second alteration to the United States Constitution, and the US government's obligation to serve the necessities of residents and to forestall wrongdoing and passing. Supporters of gun guidelines state that subjective or boundless weapons rights keep the administration from satisfying this obligation and causing a security issue. Weapon rights advocates advance guns for self-protection, including protection from oppression, just as chasing and brandishing exercises. Guns attorneys manage terms that confine and track access to guns would bring about more secure networks, while weapon rights advocates state that expanded weapon ownership by decent residents diminishes wrongdoing and cases that hoodlums have consistently had simple access to guns.

Save your time!
We can take care of your essay
  • Proper editing and formatting
  • Free revision, title page, and bibliography
  • Flexible prices and money-back guarantee
Place an order

Through the legitimate translation of the Constitution, US firearm laws or nonlegislation have been reinforced. The United States embraced the Second Amendment in 1791 and the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868. The result of these two changes to firearm strategy was the subject of a milestone choice by the US Supreme Court in 2008. Just because the Supreme Court insisted that the subsequent alteration ensures people the option to have weapons that serve and use autonomously of state civilian army and use rights. Guns are utilized for conventional genuine purposes, including home resistance. Simultaneously, it upheld the supposed 'singular rights' hypothesis of the importance of the subsequent revision and dismissed an opposing translation, the 'aggregate rights' hypothesis, that this correction shielded the state from keeping up the volunteer army or aggregate rights. Singular rights to hold and convey weapons for the volunteer army.

Firearm brutality demands a huge cost for Americans, guaranteeing countless lives every year. Powerless weapon laws and liberated access to guns have made it very simple for individuals to end their own lives and the lives of others. Weapon brutality shapes the texture of our general public, damaging millions and forcing considerable money-related weights that we as a whole offer. The underlying insights spread out the staggering extent of this particular American emergency.

The cost of American firearm savagery is awful, and it is on the ascent. Over 1.2 million Americans have been shot in the previous decade, millions more have seen weapon brutality firsthand, and several million, almost every American, will know in any event one casualty of firearm viciousness in the course of their life. 36,000 Americans are killed by firearms every year, a normal of 100 every day. 100,000 Americans are shot and harmed every year. In 2017, firearm passings arrived at their most elevated level at any rate in 40 years, with 39,773 passings in 2017 alone. Weapon passings expanded by 16% from 2014 to 2017.

Weapon viciousness takes various structures, adding to suicides, murders, unexpected passing, and law authorization killings, just as genuine wounds. Any push to spare lives must incorporate arrangements that address the one-of-a-kind parts of every one of these classes of firearm brutality. The 36,383 are Americans murdered with firearms every year, 22,274 are Americans who have killed themselves with weapon suicides (61%), 12,830 are weapon crimes (35%), 496 are law implementation shootings (1.4%), and 487 are accidental shootings (1.3%). All things considered, 100,000 Americans are injured with firearms every year, regularly with life-changing results. About seventy-five percent of nonfatal shootings are firearm attacks. About a fifth are accidental shootings. Not many nonfatal shootings are suicide endeavors, under 5%, and somewhere in the range of 1 and 2% are shootings by law requirement.

In an examination initially distributed by Mother Jones, over 75% of the occurrences of mass shootings that occurred more than 30 years of research had the firearms included bought lawfully here and there. Gun control is straightforward here. On the off chance that you take the capacity to possess weapons that are conceivably perilous from individuals who are probably going to utilize them, at that point it offers the chance of making society more secure.

At the point when the insights of firearm savagery are cited in the media or content this way, it is indispensable to recollect that most sources join manslaughter and suicide numbers as an approach to commuting home the point that weapons offer deadly results. On the off chance that somebody chooses to end their own life, it is unmistakably a disaster. Something someplace bombed that individual, making gunfire the main way out. About 25% of the effective suicide endeavors in the U.S. in 2012 included hanging or suffocation. Another 17% of individuals picked harming as the favored method to take their life. On the off chance that you join these two activities, more beyond words causes not identified with guns right now. Distinguishing individuals who are thinking about this activity is the progression we should take to furnish them with the assistance they require. If we just spotlight firearm control, at that point different techniques for suicide will see a flood of intrigue.

The gun has great and fiendish sides that it is difficult to tell who is on which side. Weapon Control banter despite everything going on in Congress, since using firearms in great ways can spare our lives, using them terribly can decimate our lives. The weapon control approach impacts numerous brutality every year, even though many programs help us to utilize firearms in the right manner, individuals despite everything use them as an execute apparatus. We should weapons just when our lives are in danger.

Make sure you submit a unique essay

Our writers will provide you with an essay sample written from scratch: any topic, any deadline, any instructions.

Cite this paper

Argumentative Essay: Gun Control Is Oppression. (2024, April 18). Edubirdie. Retrieved July 23, 2024, from
“Argumentative Essay: Gun Control Is Oppression.” Edubirdie, 18 Apr. 2024,
Argumentative Essay: Gun Control Is Oppression. [online]. Available at: <> [Accessed 23 Jul. 2024].
Argumentative Essay: Gun Control Is Oppression [Internet]. Edubirdie. 2024 Apr 18 [cited 2024 Jul 23]. Available from:

Join our 150k of happy users

  • Get original paper written according to your instructions
  • Save time for what matters most
Place an order

Fair Use Policy

EduBirdie considers academic integrity to be the essential part of the learning process and does not support any violation of the academic standards. Should you have any questions regarding our Fair Use Policy or become aware of any violations, please do not hesitate to contact us via

Check it out!
search Stuck on your essay?

We are here 24/7 to write your paper in as fast as 3 hours.